Legal Opinion

Harold W. GRANDCHAMP and Peter J. Seewald, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED AIR LINES, INC., Defendant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 18, 1988No. 86-2338PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

United Air Lines, Inc. (“United”) appeals from a jury verdict assessing damages for the intentional infliction of emotional distress arising from employment decisions involving appellees Harold Grandchamp and Peter Seewald. We find that the trial court erred in submitting the claim to the jury and reverse the judgment.

I

Grandchamp and Seewald, were employed by United as Supervisors of Inflight Services, in Denver, Colorado. Grand-champ and Seewald were responsible for the supervision and management of United flight attendants. In 1981, United initiated a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Swanson v. BixlerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  2. Churchey v. Adolph Coors Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  3. Rugg v. McCartySupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  4. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PRUDENTIAL FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  5. Joe E. Cooper, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Asplundh Tree Expert Company, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Travis v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Alam v. Reno Hilton Corp.District Court, D. Nevada · 1993
  3. Motsenbocker v. Potts, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
  4. Herbert J. Thomas Memorial Hospital Assoc. v. Susan NutterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Mass v. Martin Marietta Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1992

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API