Legal Opinion
Lutz v. Boltz
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided November 4, 1953No. 688PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Carey, J.:
In order to get at the merits of the present controversy, I shall not consider the propriety of raising this issue by an objection to the filing of the proposed amendment.
The question for determination is whether a tort-feasor may recover contribution from another, whose negligence concurred in producing an injury, but who is himself not liable to the injured person.
Title 21 Del. C. § 6101 bars recovery by a nonpaying guest from the operator of a vehicle, unless the accident was intentional on the part of the operator, or was caused by his wilful or wanton disregard of the rights of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Baltimore Transit Co. v. State Rx Rel. SchrieferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
- Fisher v. DiehlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Patterson v. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Distefano v. LambornSuperior Court of Delaware · 1951
- DiStefano v. LambornSuperior Court of Delaware · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- RBC Capital Markets, LLC v. JervisSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
- Diamond State Telephone Co. v. University of DelawareSupreme Court of Delaware · 1970
- Adler's Quality Bakery, Inc. v. Gaseteria, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Montgomery County v. Valk Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Burmeister v. YoungstromSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.