Legal Opinion

Rhea v. Millsap

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 19, 1945No. Civ. 14570PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYork, P. J.

The facts which form the basis of the instant litigation appear to be briefly as follows:

On or about March 3, 1940, Robert Stephen Rhea and respondent Fayetta Lenora Rhea were married at Covington, Kentucky; that on September 2, 1941, said respondent filed suit for divorce against Robert Stephen Rhea and the interlocutory decree therein was entered October 3, 1941. Thereafter, during the month of June, 1942, “Fayetta Lenora Rhea and Robert Stephen Rhea, had a reconciliation of their differences, and agreed to resume marital relations, and pursuant thereto and in accordance therewith they did…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McGuinness v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Raps v. RapsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Nelson v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Britton v. BrysonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Tomb v. TombCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Martínez v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
  2. Nealis v. CarlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Roca Bacó v. ThomsonSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954
  4. Daut v. DautCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API