Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Morris v. Sherman

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1932No. File No. 6126PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee CuetaM.

This is a proceeding in mandamus to compel the defendant, as auditor, to submit for publication the delinquent tax list for 1932 in accordance with § 2189 of the 1925 Supplement to the Compiled Laws of 1913. After a hearing in district court an alternative writ of mandamus previously issued was quashed and the plaintiff appeals to this court. The sole question involved in the proceeding and on the appeal is whether or not § 2189 of the 1925 Supplement to the Compiled Laws of 1913, regulating the publication of notice of delinquent tax sale, has been superseded for the year 1932 by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Dallas v. Dallas Consolidated Street Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Lapeyre v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. State Ex Rel. Elsas v. Missouri Workmen's Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  4. People ex rel. Campbell v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1851
  5. People ex rel. Ryan v. NordheimIllinois Supreme Court · 1881

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company v. WentzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  2. State Ex Rel. Sanstead v. FreedNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Caven v. ClarkDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1948
  4. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company v. WentzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  5. State Ex Rel. Sanstead v. FreedNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API