Legal Opinion

State v. Lyles

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 20, 1989No. 8811SC690PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECTON, Judge.

Following his conviction of robbery with a firearm, the defendant, Frederick Lyles, filed a Motion for Appropriate Relief, seeking a new trial on the ground that his constitutional right of confrontation had been violated by the jury’s exposure to certain extraneous evidence. Evidence presented at the hearing on defendant’s motion showed that the jury members tampered with a photographic exhibit during deliberations. As a result, they were exposed to information not introduced in evidence which contradicted defendant’s alibi witnesses. Until that information was revealed, the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Turner v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Parker v. GladdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. State v. CherrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. United States v. Paul C. PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Michael Lee Fullwood v. R.C. Lee, Warden of Central Prison, Raleigh, North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
  2. Walsh v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. HeatwoleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  4. Gregory v. KilbrideCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Pinckney v. Van DammeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API