Legal Opinion

Huth v. Smithers-Oasis Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 31, 2024No. 30795Published

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Huth v. Smithers-Oasis Co.,

2024-Ohio-2886.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) WILLIAM P. HUTH C.A. No. 30795 Appellant v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE SMITHERS-OASIS COMPANY, et al. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF SUMMIT, OHIO Appellees CASE No. CV-2022-10-3512 DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY Dated: July 31, 2024 HENSAL, Judge. {¶1} Williams Huth appeals an order of the Summit County Court of Common Pleas that affirmed a determination of the Unemployment Compensation Review Commission (“UCRC”). This Court affirms. I. {¶2} Mr.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Irvine v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Tzangas, Plakas & Mannos v. AdministratorOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Hampel v. Food Ingredients Specialties, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Peyton v. Sun T v. & AppliancesOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Williams v. Ohio Department of Job & Family ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API