Legal Opinion
Hampel v. Food Ingredients Specialties, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 21, 2000No. 99-55PublishedCited by 121 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.
We are asked to determine whether the evidence presented in this case is sufficient to withstand a motion for directed verdict or JNOV on appellant’s claim for sexual harassment and, if not, whether the submission of that claim to. the jury was sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial on appellant’s claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress.
I
SEXUAL HARASSMENT
As relevant here, R.C. 4112.02(A) makes it an unlawful discriminatory practice “[f]or any employer, because of the * * * sex * * * of any person, * * * to discriminate against that person with respect to hire, tenure,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by121 opinions
- Hawkins v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Lucarell v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- Sister Michael Marie v. American Red CrossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Gallagher v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Carrie Braun v. Ultimate JetchartersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.