Steiner by Steiner v. Bell Tele. Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROWLEY, Judge:
The sole issue raised in this appeal is whether Pennsylvania should recognize a cause of action by a child for loss of parental consortium when the parent is injured by a third-party tort-feasor’s negligence. For the reasons set forth herein, we affirm the order of the trial court and refuse to recognize such a cause of action.
On December 29, 1981, the two minor appellants 1 were at home with their mother when someone broke into the house. Hearing the intruder’s footsteps, the appellants’ mother dialed the Bell Telephone Company’s directory assistance number…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Sinn v. BurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Niederman v. BrodskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Cathcart v. Keene Industrial InsulationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Ferriter v. Daniel O'Connell's Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Mendillo v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Villareal v. State, Dept. of Transp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1989
- City of Philadelphia v. Lead Industries Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- High v. HowardOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Walton v. Avco Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.