Legal Opinion

Ritter v. Seestedt

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1920No. Docket No. 21PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Hosmer (George S.), J. Bill in aid of execution by James C. Ritter against Otto A. Seestedt and Lucile B. Seestedt. From a decree for plaintiff, defendant Lucile B. Seestedt appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

This proceeding is one in aid of execution. Plaintiff had two judgments against defendant Otto A. Seestedt and others, aggregating the sum of $562.73, and he caused a levy to be made on a certain moving picture theater situated at 531 Baker street in the city of Detroit, to which Seestedt had formerly held title, but which he had transferred in March, 1916, to his wife, Lucile, the other defendant herein, for an expressed consideration of $5,000.

The indebtedness which furnished the basis for the judgments was contracted several months prior to the conveyance of the theater to Mrs. Seestedt,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. La Plant v. LesterMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Freiborg v. Chrysler CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. United Securities Corporation v. BrutonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. Holden v. WalkerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Sherberneau v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Spencer v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API