Legal Opinion

Utah State Bar v. Bates

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 2017No. Case No. 20150483PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Direct Appeal

Justice Durham,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

¶1 The Utah State Bar’s Office of Professional Conduct (OPC) appeals from a final judgment of the Third District Court suspending Abraham Bates from the practice of law for a period of five months for violating rules 1.4(a), 1.15(a), and 1.15(d) of the Utah Rules of Professional Conduct. The OPC asks this court to elevate Mr. Bates’ sanction from suspension to disbarment, by inferring from the district court’s factual findings that Mr. Bates acted both “knowingly” and “with the intent to benefit” from his misconduct. We affirm…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Matter of Discipline of BabilisUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Matter of Discipline of InceUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In Re the Discipline of JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Utah State Bar v. JardineUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Discipline of Alvin LundgrenUtah Supreme Court · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Porenta v. PorentaUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Rose v. Office of Prof'l ConductUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Steffensen v. Office of Prof'l Conduct (In Re Steffensen)Utah Supreme Court · 2018
  4. In re Discipline of SantanaUtah Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Porenta v. PorentaUtah Supreme Court · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API