Commonwealth v. Owens
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CERCONE, President Judge:
In this appeal, appellant, Nathan N. Owens, claims that a retrial would subject him to double jeopardy. He contends that a mistrial resulted due to overreaching on the part of the trial judge and alternatively, that there was no manifest necessity for the declaration of the mistrial. We find no merit to either of appellant’s arguments and thus, affirm the order of the trial court denying appellant’s pre-trial motion to dismiss.
Appellant was charged with simple and aggravated assault perpetrated upon a prison guard in an institution wherein appellant was an inmate. He…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Commonwealth v. StarksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. WidemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. VirtuSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TejedaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. SimonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. EganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. PhillippiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. HunterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.