Peterson Industries, Inc. v. Farmer
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Darrell Hickman, Justice.
This appeal asks us to reaffirm our rule that when a contract of employment does not bind the employee to serve for a specified time, the contract may be terminated at will by either party. See Gaulden v. Emerson Electric Co., 284 Ark. 149, 680 S.W.2d 92 (1984). We are unable to reach the merits of the appeal because the appellant has failed to abstract all pertinent parts of the record; therefore, we affirm. Ark. R. Sup. Ct. Rule 9 (d).
Barbara Kaye Farmer, the appellee, was terminated by the appellant, Peterson Industries. The reason given by the company was that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jackson v. Kinark Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Gaulden v. Emerson Electric Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Dyke Industries, Inc. v. E. W. Johnson Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Collins v. DuncanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mills v. HollandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991