Legal Opinion

Peterson Industries, Inc. v. Farmer

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 3, 1986No. 85-246PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

This appeal asks us to reaffirm our rule that when a contract of employment does not bind the employee to serve for a specified time, the contract may be terminated at will by either party. See Gaulden v. Emerson Electric Co., 284 Ark. 149, 680 S.W.2d 92 (1984). We are unable to reach the merits of the appeal because the appellant has failed to abstract all pertinent parts of the record; therefore, we affirm. Ark. R. Sup. Ct. Rule 9 (d).

Barbara Kaye Farmer, the appellee, was terminated by the appellant, Peterson Industries. The reason given by the company was that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Kinark Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Gaulden v. Emerson Electric Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Dyke Industries, Inc. v. E. W. Johnson Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  4. Collins v. DuncanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mills v. HollandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API