Gaulden v. Emerson Electric Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robert H. Dudley, Justice.
The plaintiff, William Gaulden, contends that the trial court erred by dismissing his amended complaint for failure to state facts upon which relief could be granted. Jurisdiction is in this court to construe the Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 29(1 )(c). We affirm the trial court.
In the amended complaint, plaintiff alleged that he was employed by defendant, Emerson Electric Company, as a truck driver and in September, 1982, “was laid off for lack of work”; that on December 15, 1982, defendant’s personnel manager requested that he return to work by 7:00 a.m.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Griffin v. EricksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897
- Jackson v. Kinark Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Harvey v. Eastman Kodak Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Petty v. Missouri & Arkansas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hogue v. ClintonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Crain Industries, Inc. v. CassSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Gladden v. Arkansas Children's HospitalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Stow v. CochranCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Skeets v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.