Legal Opinion

State v. Senzarino

Ashtabula County Court of Common Pleas

Decided March 10, 1967No. Nos. 8564 and 8583PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPontius, J.

The defendants, Dominic P. Senzarino and Clyde C. Perod, were found guilty by a jury of two offenses com*242mitted August 21, 1966: 1) attempting to force entrance into a safe, and 2) daytime breaking and entering. They were indicted jointly with one Frank Albert Scungio and one Peter A. Costello, Jr., who were granted several trials.

The motion of each defendant herein for a new trial, supported by affidavits of counsel, was argued and submitted March 7, 1967. Each motion contains nineteen identical, separate grounds for a new trial. Of these, only five were urged in oral argument, and no…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Bruno v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Sampeyreac and Stewart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1833

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. EnsmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. State v. PerodOhio Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Elmer Cantrell v. Frank GrayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  4. State v. Khalifa-ElOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API