Legal Opinion
Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine v. Horinko
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 6, 2003No. 02 CIV. 7049 LTS KNFPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER
SWAIN, District Judge.
This Amended Opinion and Order, issued on October 6, 2003, supersedes the Court’s Opinion and Order, dated August 25, 2003, in this case.
Before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (“PCRM”), People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (“PETA”), American Anti-Vivisection Society (“AAVS”), Alternatives Research & Development Foundation (“ARDF”), Rosa Naparstek, Scott Mishler and John Gentry (collectively, “Plaintiffs”)…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Laura Holtz v. Rockefeller & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Public Citizen v. United States Department of JusticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Fl v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2006
- Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine v. LeavittDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Physicians Committee For Responsible Medicine v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility v. Lee ZeldinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.