Legal Opinion
Carvel Corp. v. Lefkowitz
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 1, 1979PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Anthony J. Ferraro, J.
Petitioner, Carvel Corporation, makes this application to quash a subpoena duces tecum dated July 26,1978 issued by respondent, Attorney-General of the State of New York. The subpoena sought to be quashed consists of 39 pages *285containing 99 detailed items covering a period of 8% years and spanning a territory which encompasses 16 States.
Petitioner contends that the subpoena should be quashed because (1) its demands are unreasonably burdensome and would require an expenditure of more than $250,000 and (2) it unnecessarily requires the disclosure of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Matter of A'hearn v. Comm. on Unlawful Practice of the Law of the New York County Lawyers'ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- La Belle Creole International, S. A. v. Attorney-GeneralNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Sigety v. HynesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dellwood Foods, Inc. v. AbramsNew York Supreme Court · 1981