Legal Opinion
Se-Kure Controls, Inc. v. Diam USA, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 18, 2009No. 06 C 4857PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RONALD A. GUZMAN, District Judge.
Se-Kure Controls, Inc. (“Se-Kure”) has sued Diam USA, Inc. (“Diam”) for infringement of U.S. Patent No. RE37,590 E (“the '590 Patent”). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 56, defendants Diam; Pop Displays USA, LLC (“POP Displays”); and third-party defendant Telefonix, Inc. (“Telefonix”) (collectively hereinafter “defendants”) have moved for summary judgment on the issue of invalidity under 35 U.S.C. § 103. For the reasons provided herein, the Court grants defendants’ motion.
Facts
Plaintiff Se-Kure is an Illinois…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lori M. GLEASON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MESIROW FINANCIAL, INCORPORATED, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Se-Kure Controls, Inc. v. Sennco Solutions, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009