Lancaster v. Doctor's Hospital
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered December 6, 1993, which, after a jury trial on the issue of continuous treatment, dismissed the complaint as against defendant-respondent as barred by the Statute of Limitations, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff’s claims of error in the trial court’s charge to the jury on continuous treatment are unpreserved (see, Harris v Armstrong, 64 NY2d 700), and in any event without merit. The charge apprised the jury of the correct rules to be applied in easily understandable language that specifically related to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Massie v. CrawfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Harris v. ArmstrongNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. HultsNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Teichner v. W & J Holsteins, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Cea v. FreedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mohamed v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011