State v. Urista
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Leben, J.:
Gerardo Urista Jr. agreed to plead no contest for 15 separate offenses, including aggravated robbery with the use of a handgun and discharge of a firearm at an occupied building, in exchange for the State’s recommendation that these sentences would be run concurrently. This agreement would have substantially limited the time Urista spent in prison. Though the prosecutor recommended concurrent sentences at the sentencing hearing, the prosecutor also made several statements that put Urista in a negative light. After both sides had made their presentations, the district court gave…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- State v. IvorySupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- State v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- State v. FloresSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. UristaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- State v. TidwellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2019