Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Fort

Syracuse City Court

Decided July 14, 1981PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Mathilde C. Bersani, J.

The question before this court is whether a District Attorney’s “blank notice” of intention to use identification evidence at trial meets the minimum requirements of CPL 710.30.

On April 20, 1981, the defendant was arraigned on the charge of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree (Penal Law, § 165.40). The District Attorney served the defendant a notice of intention to use identification evidence at trial. This notice, dated April 17, 1981, specified that “the evidence will consist of testimony regarding an observation of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. People v. AllweissNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. People v. BriggsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. People v. Utley, New York County Courts1974
  5. People v. SlaterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. Riley-JamesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. People v. HiltonNew York Supreme Court · 1990
  3. People v. MenaNew York Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. CoxNew York Supreme Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API