Legal Opinion
People v. Cox
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 1, 1994PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1012OPINION OF THE COURT
Steven W. Fisher, J.
The principal issue presented on these motions to preclude and suppress involves the extent to which CPL 710.30 (1) (b) requires that a defendant be notified of the number of identification witnesses the prosecution intends to call at trial.
On April 12, 1993, the defendants were jointly indicted for murder and other crimes arising out of the death of Edward Handler. At arraignment, each defendant was served with a CPL 710.30 (1) (b) notice which asserted that "the People intend to offer at trial the testimony of a witness who has identified the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. GissendannerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. RodriguezNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. BrelandNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. TasNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. CentenoNew York Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. OwensCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2001