Legal Opinion
Bradley v. Armstrong Rubber Company
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 17, 1997No. 96-60233PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
130 F.3d 168
28 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,309
Bessie G. BRADLEY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees,
v.
The ARMSTRONG RUBBER COMPANY (Now Pirelli Armstrong Tire
Company) and Condere Corporation, d/b/a Fidelity
Tire and Manufacturing Company,
Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants.
No. 96-60233.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 17, 1997.
Jack W. Harang, Metairie, LA, Stuart Housel Smith, Sacks & Smith, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees.
Ernest G. Taylor, Jr., Robert H. Weaver, Watkins, Ludlam & Stennis, Jackson, MS, for Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants.
Appe…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Bernice H. ShanbaumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Houston Unlimited, Inc. Metal Processing v. Mel Acres RanchTexas Supreme Court · 2014
- SED Holdings v. TM Prop SolutionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
- Wilson v. Amoco CorporationDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1998
- Wilson v. Amoco CorporationDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1998
- SED Holdings v. TM Prop SolutionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.