Legal Opinion
Hayden Pub. Co., Inc. v. Cox Broadcasting Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 19, 1983No. 79-C-414PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
COSTANTINO, District Judge.
In the above-entitled antitrust action, defendants have moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Fed.R. Civ.P. In addition to opposing the motion, plaintiff has cross-moved for partial summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motion for summary judgment on all causes of action is hereby granted in its entirety. 1
Plaintiff Hayden Publishing Company (“Hayden”) commenced this antitrust action charging both defendants Cox Broadcasting Corporation (“Cox”) and United Technical Publications, Inc. (“UTP”), a…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hayden Publishing Co., Inc. v. Cox Broadcasting Corp. And United Technical Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Avins v. MollDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Reborn Enterprises, Inc. v. Fine Child, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Sales & Advertising Promotion, Inc. v. Donrey, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1984