Baker v. Utecht
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant seeks his release by habeas corpus from the Minnesota state prison, where he is under conviction and sentence 'by a court of that State for the offense of sodomy. The District Court denied his application for a writ.
The only substantial federal question raised by the application is appellant’s charge that he was convicted without due process as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment, in that he was not given a public trial.1 It appears that the trial court ordered the court room cleared during the testimony of the prosecuting witness, a girl 13 years old, and that of her mother, as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Betts v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Ex Parte HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Salinger v. LoiselSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- American Chicle Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Reeves v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
- Chick v. KentuckyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1956
- Hollman v. WilkinsonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1954