Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings--Larry Gordon, Witness, John Doe, Intervenor-Appellant v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 5, 1983No. 83-3243PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.
The intervenor-appellant, John Doe (Doe), appeals from an order of the District Court for the Northern District of Ohio which requires Larry S. Gordon (Gordon) to answer certain questions posed by a federal grand jury.
The factual background to this controversy is straightforward. For several years a grand jury sitting in the Northern District of Ohio has been conducting an investigation into possible violations of the Internal Revenue Code by Reuben Sturman (Stur-man) and several alleged corporate facades under his control.
Despite continuous efforts, the grand jury…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Perlman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Edward E. Colton and Lillian Kaltman v. United States of America, United States of America v. Edward E. ColtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. Robert W. Ritchie, Personally and in His Capacity as a Partner/officer of Ritchie, Fels & Dillard, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- In Re Antitrust Grand JuryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Herlancer Ross v. City of Memphis, Walter Crews and Alfred Gray, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- In Re: Grand Jury SubpoenaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.