Legal Opinion
In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided September 20, 1999No. 98-40870, 99-40262 and 99-40271PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Chief Judge:
In these consolidated appeals, Appellants, targets of an ongoing grand jury investigation, challenge three district court orders: two denying Appellants’ motions to return documents turned over to Appel-lee in the process of complying with a grand jury subpoena (Nos. 98-40870 and 99-40271) and one granting Appellee’s motion to compel production of certain documents under the subpoena (No. 99-40262). We dismiss all three appeals for want of jurisdiction and, as to No. 99-40262, grant mandamus.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Corporate Appellants 1 operate plants in south…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Successor in Interest to New England Merchants Leasing Corporation, Etc. v. Ogden CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- United States v. James Harvey Brown, Also Known as Jim BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Chevron Corporation v. Aaron PageCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- In re Thirty-third Statewide Investigating Grand JurySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- In Re Grand Jury SubpoenaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.