Legal Opinion
Pingle v. Conner
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 9, 1887PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from Macomb. (Hooker, J., presiding.) Bill for specific performance of contract. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
The complainants Pingle & Losen are omnibus proprietors in Mount Clemens, Macomb county. Brehler is proprietor of the Clifton House, and he and his wife are joint tenants of the realty upon which it is situated. Egnew is the lessee of the Avery House. The defendant Henry Conner is the owner of the Sherman House, which he leased to his'sons, the defendants Edward H. and Walter J. Conner, on the first day of May, 1886, for the term of one year from the first day of April, 1886, with the privilege of another year.
'.On the eighteenth day of June, 1885, the complainants *188and Henry Conner, and one…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Stewart v. PierceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Richardson Shoe Machinery Co. v. Essex Machine Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Rathbone v. GrohMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Hill v. AndersonOhio Superior Court, Cincinnati · 1898
- Steinau v. Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1891