Legal Opinion
DUNCAN v. KEARFOTT CORPORATION
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 25, 2025No. 2:22-cv-05740Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY AMY DUNCAN, Civil Action No. 22-5740 (SDW) (JBC) Plaintiff, OPINION v. KEARFOTT CORPORATION, June 25, 2025 ASTRONAUTICS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, and JOHN DOES 1-XX, Defendants. WIGENTON, District Judge. Before this Court are Defendants Kearfott Corporation (“Kearfott”) and Astronautics Corporation of America’s (“Astronautics” and, together with Kearfott, “Defendants”) motions for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 56 (D.E. 60–61). Jurisdiction is proper pursuant to
28 U.S.C. §§ 1331
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Tolan v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.