Legal Opinion
Pandozy v. Shamis
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
Decided April 30, 2008No. 06-07-00114-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice CARTER.
Raffaele M. Pandozy appeals from a judgment granting a no-evidence summary judgment to Carolyn Shamis and Carsha, Inc. 1 Pandozy had sued them in an attempt to recover Shamis’ commission (of $35,000.00) and damages for the sale of a building and related gardens when the owner-financed sale became a disaster. 2
1. Factual and Procedural Background
Pandozy/Dallas Texas Rose Garden, Inc., sold a large house, and attached rose gardens, with the assistance of Sham-is/Carsha, to a charitable organization— the Dallas International Street Church. 3 It appears that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- King Ranch, Inc. v. ChapmanTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Jackson v. Fiesta Mart, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
- Villegas v. CarterTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. RodriguezTexas Supreme Court · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Peter Pjetrovic v. Home Depot, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2013
- Frolamo, LLC v. Arturo Ortega, 3BU Family Partnership, 533 Properties Joint Venture, Kenneth Hausenfluck, Alberto Vela, and Freedom Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2025
- MO-CON Services, Inc. v. City of Kenedy, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2026
- Victor Antolik v. Dennis Antolik, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2019