Legal Opinion
Smithers v. Bailar
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 2, 1980No. 79-2748PublishedCited by 101 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.
The question for decision is whether the district court applied improper legal precepts in deciding against a postal employee in an action brought against the United *894States Postal Service under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634, and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to e-17. Following submission of the case on the administrative record, the district court rendered judgment in favor of the Postal Service. The employee, Harry J. Smithers, has appealed. Determining…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- Wisniewski v. Johns-Manville Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Gavalik v. Continental Can Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Massarsky v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PRUDENTIAL FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Henry P. Halsell v. Kimberly-Clark CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.