Legal Opinion

Widmann v. Hammack

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1920No. 15600PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Brawley, J., entered October 30, 1918, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to foreclose a mortgage, tried on the merits to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Frances M. Robinson executed and delivered her several promissory notes, aggregating *78the sum of $21,500, payable to Edward Gr. Widmann. At the same time, and to secure the payment of the notes, she executed and delivered a mortgage in the sum of $21,500, on real property owned by her in the state of California; and in addition at the same time, as a part of the same transaction and to secure the payment in part of the same promissory notes, she executed and delivered a mortgage in the sum of $3,000 on land owned by her in King county, Washington. The transactions occurred in California, where…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mascarel v. RaffourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Dooly v. EastmanWashington Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beach v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  2. Metropolitan Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. In re City of New York to Acquire Title to East Twenty-Ninth StreetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  4. Vaughan B. Connelly, Debtor v. Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  5. Myers v. Lewis State BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API