Legal Opinion

Foshee Refining Co. v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 7, 1934No. 4746PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, Justice

(after stating the case' as above).

The injunction is sought for the purpose of enforcing certain orders and regulations of the Railroad Commission of the state, the violation of which being classed as unlawful acts. The decisive answer must depend upon whether or not an injunction, temporary or permanent, may be granted by the court at the suit of the state, or the Railroad Commission, distinctively as such, restraining refinery corporations from continuing the acts complained of. It is provided by section 7 of article 6049c, Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St.: “From and after the promulgation of any…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Henry CastroTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Overton Refining Co. v. TerrellDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1933
  3. Crowder v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Dick DuncanTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Carp v. Texas State Board of Examiners in OptometryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  3. City of Dallas v. YarbroughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  4. Tyreco Refining Co.v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Culver v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API