Legal Opinion

Overton Refining Co. v. Terrell

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided August 7, 1933No. 459PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEE CURIAM.

This is one of several suits brought by refinery corporations operating in East Texas against the Railroad Commission to restrain it from requiring the installation of meters, the making of reports, and generally from interfering with the business of the plaintiff through inspection of its plant, books and records and the gauging of its tanks, or in any other manner with the conduct of its business.

These companies attack, as the pipe line companies did, Atlas Pipe Line Co. v. Ross Sterling et al., 4 F. Supp. 441, opinion this day rendered, the statutes and orders of the commission…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Ellis v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Ex Parte GouldCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  4. Atlas Pipe Line Co. v. SterlingDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1933
  5. Lewis v. HaydenArizona Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Amazon Petroleum Corporation v. Railroad CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1934
  2. Foshee Refining Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API