Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Henry Castro

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1925No. 4211PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Cureton

This is a habeas corpus proceeding, in which Henry Castro applies for discharge from a judgment of the Ninety-fourth District Court punishing him for contempt.

The record shows that relator’s confinement is based upon a judgment in contempt for having remarried within a year after a decree of divorce granted him on the 17th of August, 1923, on the ground of cruel treatment. The trial judge placed a clause in the decree, reading as follows:

“It is further ordered that neither party be permitted to marry within a year from this date, except to each other.”

Henry Castro did marry within a year from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Woodward v. BlakeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  2. People v. ProutyIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Wallace v. McDanielOregon Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SterlingTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Ex Parte HenryTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Ex Parte ArmstrongCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Gress v. GressCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  5. Simpson v. NeelyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API