Legal Opinion

Walti v. Willamette Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 22, 1987No. 86-0484; CA A40806PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This action for malicious prosecution is based on a claim that defendant brought against plaintiff for nuisance and intentional interference with contractual relations, in which defendant sought an injunction prohibiting plaintiff from trespassing upon a particular United States Forest Service road and from entering the portion of the Middle Santiam Wilderness area known as the Pyramid Creek Sale. The complaint in this action was dismissed for failure to state a claim. We reverse and remand.

In July, 1984, defendant brought the action against plaintiff and others as a result of their…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Retail Credit Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Multnomah County v. Willamette Towing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1907
  3. O'TOOLE v. FranklinOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Carnation Lumber Co. v. McKenneyOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Mitchell v. Silver Lake LodgeOregon Supreme Court · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Praegitzer Industries, Inc. v. Rollins Burdick Hunter of Oregon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. Hansen v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Walti v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. Praegitzer Industries, Inc. v. Rollins Burdick Hunter of Oregon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API