Legal Opinion

Burnett v. Goodyear

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1950No. Docket 18, Calendar 44,759PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

By their bill of complaint plaintiffs seek a decree construing the fifth paragraph of the will of Philip T. Colgrove, deceased. Defendant’s motion to dismiss was granted. Plaintiffs, as executor and executrix of the will of Lawrence E. Col-grove, have appealed.

Under plaintiffs’ contention in the instant case Lawrence E. Colgrove, a son of Philip T. Colgrove, became the sole devisee of the Philip T. Colgrove estate, subject however to certain rights of Philip’s widow, Carrie Gr. Colgrove, and also certain other testamentary provisions in Philip T. Colgrove’s will which are not material here.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. MacKenzie v. Union Guardian Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Chapin v. ChapinMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  3. In re Blodgett's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Calhoun v. CracknellMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Killefer v. BassettMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Coon v. HeinzmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  2. Emerson v. EmersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API