Legal Opinion

Killefer v. Bassett

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1906No. Docket No. 78PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Yan Burén; Carr, J. Submitted January-31, 1906. Bill by William Killefer, administrator de bonis non, with the will annexed, of the estate of Theodore E. Hendrick, deceased, against Fred R. Bassett, administrator of the estate of Elvira C. Hendrick, deceased, for an accounting. From a decree for complainant, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The bill in this case was filed by the complainant, as administrator de bonis non, with the will annexed, of the estate of Theodore E. Hendrick, deceased, against Fred R. Bassett, as administrator of the estate of Elvira C. Hendrick, deceased, for an accounting for the assets which were in Mrs. Hendrick’s hands at the time of her death, under and by the terms of the last will of *2said Theodore E. Hendrick; she having been appointed executrix' of his estate. The answer of the defendant denies that there were any assets in the hands of his intestate or that any ever came to his hands belonging…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Van Horne v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Mulvane v. RudeIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Norris v. . BeyeaNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  4. Jones v. JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Gifford v. ChoateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Quarton v. BartonMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Bateman v. CaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Long v. WillseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  4. Lyons v. LusterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  5. Crisp v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API