Peia v. United States
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT UNITED STATES’S MOTION TO DISMISS
DORSEY, Senior District Judge.
The United States moves to dismiss all Plaintiffs claims. The motion is granted.
I. JURISDICTION
Plaintiff, pro mi, sues under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968, and the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1346, 1402, 2401-2402, 2411-2412, 2671-2680. This court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1964(a) and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331,1346(b)(1).
II. BACKGROUND
The facts are taken as alleged in the complaint 1 . Plaintiff alleges a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cunha v. MoukawsherDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024