Legal Opinion

State v. Nelson

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided December 7, 1993No. A-92-448PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Connolly, Judge.

This appeal arises from the convictions of the appellant, Richard M. Nelson, of driving while under the influence of alcohol, third offense, and refusing to submit to a chemical blood, breath, or urine test. Nelson appealed his county court convictions to the district court on grounds that the trial court had committed prejudicial error by giving an improper jury instruction on the meaning of “under the influence of alcoholic liquor.” The district court affirmed the judgment of the county court. The State contends that Nelson’s assignment of error concerning the jury…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. CoppleNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. GreenNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. ErlewineNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. HernandezNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. RichterNebraska Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. JimenezNebraska Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. State v. JimenezNebraska Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. State v. StuthmanNebraska Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Stunkel v. County of DawsonNebraska Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API