Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Danaher

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 20, 2002No. 01-469Published

1Dissent

Dooley, J.,

¶ 18 dissenting. Defendant has engaged in conduct that is undesirable and upsetting to the'minor victim of the sex crime for which he has been convicted and is on probation. On numerous occasions he has placed himself in the position to watch and stare at the victim, on one occasion for more than one hour. During none of these incidents has defendant attempted to touch the victim, to communicate with her, or to seek communication from her.

¶ 19 I agree that probation conditions could have been crafted to prevent defendant’s actions and should have been so crafted. One of the ironies…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. AustinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  2. State v. MosesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  3. State v. LeggettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  4. State v. GoyetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  5. Plant v. AhlbergSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API