Legal Opinion
People v. Feeley
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 29, 2016No. Docket 152534PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBernstein, J.
At issue in this case is whether the term “police officer” in MCL 750.81d(7)(b)(i) encompasses reserve police officers. We reverse the Court of Appeals’ ruling that reserve police officers are not police officers for purposes of MCL 750.81d(7)(b)(i), and we remand to the Court of Appeals to address whether the district court correctly ruled that the reserve police officer in this case lacked the authority to conduct a stop of defendant.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In the early morning hours of May 5, 2014, a ruckus at a Brighton bar resulted in a call to the police. Two officers from the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Sun Valley Foods Co. v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Allison v. AEW CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLPMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. MoreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Mayor of Lansing v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re Forfeiture of $5,264Michigan Supreme Court · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- People of Michigan v. Tremel AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
- 165544_66_01.PdfMichigan Supreme Court · 2024
- Cindy Schaaf v. Charlene ForbesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
- City of Coldwater v. Consumers Energy CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2017
- City of Holland v. Consumers Energy CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.