Legal Opinion

Dantran, Inc. v. United States Department of Labor

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided April 13, 2001No. 00-1656PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COFFIN, Senior Circuit Judge.

After six years of litigation challenging the Secretary of Labor’s attempt to bar them from government contracting because of irregular payroll practices, appellants Dantran, Inc., and its principal, Robert C. Holmes, prevailed. This court ruled that, given the circumstances, “debarment would be a punishment totally out of proportion to the offense (and, therefore, contrary to the regulations).” See Dantran v. U.S. Dep’t of Labor, 171 F.3d 58, 74-75 (1st Cir.1999). Having achieved that outcome, appellants came back to court seeking attorney’s fees under the Equal…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Ardestani v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. United States v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. United States v. Plat 20, Lot 17Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Schock v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  2. Aronov v. NapolitanoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  3. McEwen v. Tennessee Department of SafetyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  4. Castaneda Castillo v. Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  5. Citizens Awareness Network, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API