Legal Opinion

Foristiere v. Aetna Ins. Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1930No. Docket No. S.F. 13176PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PRESTON, J.—

Action in assumpsit on a policy of insurance for a loss by fire. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals. Two causes are presented on one record. Both policies are of the standard form. The facts in each case are identical except as to the name of the defendant and the amount of insurance, together with an immaterial difference as to the date of the beginning of the period of insurance. We shall, therefore, deal with the facts of but one cause.

One Catania owned four adjoining city lots in Fresno upon which was situated an olive oil factory with fixed and movable machinery…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Raulet v. Northwestern Nat'l Ins. Co. of MilwaukeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Forward v. Continental InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Pollard v. HarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Sharp v. Scottish Union & National InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Kavanaugh v. Franklin Fire Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Golden Gate Motor Transport Co. v. Great American Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API