Foristiere v. Aetna Ins. Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PRESTON, J.—
Action in assumpsit on a policy of insurance for a loss by fire. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals. Two causes are presented on one record. Both policies are of the standard form. The facts in each case are identical except as to the name of the defendant and the amount of insurance, together with an immaterial difference as to the date of the beginning of the period of insurance. We shall, therefore, deal with the facts of but one cause.
One Catania owned four adjoining city lots in Fresno upon which was situated an olive oil factory with fixed and movable machinery…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Raulet v. Northwestern Nat'l Ins. Co. of MilwaukeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Forward v. Continental InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Pollard v. HarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Sharp v. Scottish Union & National InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Kavanaugh v. Franklin Fire Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Golden Gate Motor Transport Co. v. Great American Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1936