Legal Opinion

State v. Roberts

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 4, 1974No. 7418SC844Published

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

Defendant assigns as error the denial of his motion for a continuance in order that he might secure the attendance of a witness. The motion was made at trial after the State had rested its case. The record discloses that the alleged offense occurred -on 9 June 1973; that counsel was appointed on 11 June 1973; *126that the indictment was returned on or about 6 August 1973; that the case had been calendared for trial on two previous occasions, but had been continued upon motions by defendant; that the case came on for trial in May 1974; that two days before the trial, defense counsel…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. DooleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. State v. GaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. FosterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. State v. MosesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. State v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API