State v. Roberts
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
Defendant assigns as error the denial of his motion for a continuance in order that he might secure the attendance of a witness. The motion was made at trial after the State had rested its case. The record discloses that the alleged offense occurred -on 9 June 1973; that counsel was appointed on 11 June 1973; *126that the indictment was returned on or about 6 August 1973; that the case had been calendared for trial on two previous occasions, but had been continued upon motions by defendant; that the case came on for trial in May 1974; that two days before the trial, defense counsel…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. DooleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. GaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. FosterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. MosesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.