Legal Opinion

Muhammad v. Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 15, 2012No. 11-3669UnpublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant Akhi Raheem Muhammad, proceeding pro se, appeals from the District Court’s order granting the defendant-appellees’ motion to dismiss Muhammad’s complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1988. For the reasons that follow, we will affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand for further proceedings.

I

In July 2008, Muhammad — an experienced litigant — filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, alleging that some 200 defendants violated his civil rights. He sought, inter alia, permanent injunctive relief requiring the…

3Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Tennessee v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Sameric Corporation Of Delaware, Inc. v. City Of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by36 opinions

  1. Owens v. ArmstrongDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
  2. Alboniga v. School Board of Broward County FloridaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
  3. Starego ex rel. Starego v. New Jersey State Interscholastic Athletic Ass'nDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
  4. Davenport v. SpencerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Lamberson v. PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2013

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API