Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Stevens v. Superior Court for King County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1914No. 12423PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Application filed in the supreme court October 13, 1914, for a writ of mandamus, upon denying an application for a change of judges, after a hearing upon affidavits.

1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.

This cause is before us on an alternative writ of mandate.

The application for the writ arose out of the following facts: A divorce action, wherein Sarah A. Gust was plaintiff and Adolph Gust was defendant, was heard and determined in the superior court of King county before the respondent judge. Upon appeal to this court, the judgment was modified, except as to the attorney fee which had been fixed by the court at the sum of $5,000 in favor of the wife against the husband. *421Gust v. Gust, 78 Wash. 412, 139 Pac. 199. After the filing of the remittitur in the court below on the 16th day of June,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Lefebvre v. CliffordWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Fortson Shingle Co. v. SkaglandWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Nance v. WoodsWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. State ex rel. Gourley v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Gust v. GustWashington Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McClenny v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Cooper v. CooperWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. State ex rel. Farmer v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. State ex rel. Nixon v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API