Fortson Shingle Co. v. Skagland
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, W. P. Bell, J., entered December 31, 1912, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for an injunction.
1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.
This is an action to enjoin the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff in floating shingle bolts and other forest products in Segelson creek, a tributary of the Stillaguamish river. Segelson creek flows through land owned by the defendants. The complaint alleges that it is a floatable and navigable stream for shingle bolts and other forest products, and that the defendants had forbidden plaintiff to use the stream for floating its shingle bolts and other forest products in that part of the stream which flowed over their land. A decree was entered in harmony with the prayer of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Lefebvre v. CliffordWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Olson v. MerrillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
- Monroe Mill Co. v. MenzelWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- Berens v. CoxWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- State ex rel. United Tanners Timber Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by10 opinions
- Vilardo v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- State v. FunkWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- State ex rel. Davis v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- State ex rel. Foster v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- State ex rel. Farmer v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.