Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Apfel

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided May 31, 2000No. 98-4100-SACPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CROW, Senior District Judge.

This is an action to review the final decision of the defendant Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying the claimant John L. Anderson’s applications for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act (“Act”) and for supplemental security income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Act. The case is ripe for decision on the parties’ briefs filed pursuant to D.Kan. Rule 83.7.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The claimant applied for disability benefits and SSI on June 15, 1995, asserting he had been disabled as of May 27, 1995.…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Lester v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Reddick v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Priest v. BarnhartDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
  2. Esmeralda Moreno v. Frank J. Bisgnano, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2026
  3. Fiatte v. Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
  4. Forson v. Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
  5. Hulsey v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API