Legal Opinion

People of the State of California v. Eisengrein

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 17, 2025No. 3:24-cv-01481Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF Case No. 24-cv-01481-BAS-BJC CALIFORNIA ex rel. SAN DIEGO 12 COMPREHENSIVE PAIN ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 13 MANAGEMENT CENTER, INC., MOTION TO DISMISS 14 Plaintiff, (ECF No. 9) 15 v. 16 JAYSEN EISENGREIN and SANDRA LOVE, 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 Before the Court are Defendants Jaysen Eisengrein and Sandra Love’s 21 (“Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff San Diego Comprehensive Pain Management 22 Center, Inc.’s (“SDCPMC” or “Plaintiff”) Complaint. (Motion to Dismiss (“MTD”), ECF 23…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Maya v. Centex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. White v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API