Legal Opinion

39 Joy Street Condominium Ass'n v. Board of Appeal

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 15, 1998PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.

This appeal arises from a decision of a Superior Court judge annulling the grant of a variance by the board of appeal of Boston (board). The variance, granted by the board to the defendant Ciancarelh on January 10, 1995, permitted him to *486operate a beauty salon on the ground floor and basement of a four-floor condominium building located in the Beacon Hill section of Boston, a neighborhood zoned for residential use only. The plaintiffs, consisting of the condominium association’s board of managers and the residents, appealed to the Superior Court, claiming that (1) Ciancarelli did not obtain…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Josephs v. Board of Appeals of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  2. Warren v. Zoning Board of Appeals of AmherstMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. McEneaney v. Chestnut Hill Realty Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
  4. Damaskos v. Board of Appeal of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  5. Bicknell Realty Co. v. Board of Appeal of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Aldrich v. ADD Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Sea Pines Condominium III Ass'n v. SteffensMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  3. Ebzery v. City of SheridanWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  4. CBK Brook House I Ltd. Partnership v. BerlinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  5. Sheppard v. Zoning Board of Appeal of BostonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API